RuneScape Fan Fiction:Requests for adminship/Ugozima (2)

Ugozima^{Talk • Contribs • Edit count}

This page is an archive. Do not edit it.

My fellow RSFFWikians, I, Ugozima, do understand the reponsibility that comes with the Sysop status.
Well, here I go again. 4 months and 400 edits later, I am once more running for Sysop status. I have now made 1,009 edits to our wiki, and I believe I am ready to receive the status. Without my edits, this wiki most certainly wouldn't be the same. And now, we have more editors and more than 1.5 k pages, all of which happened since my previous RFA, and all those newbies and new articles are going a new, fresh pair of hands to help out! And if you, my e-mmunity, do not think so, I, again, completely understand. Ugozima 22:50, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Yea or nay?

Voting:

Support: 0

Neutral: 0

Oppose: 0

Yea!

• I think it's time for another Admin, and Ugozima would be great because he has a great knowledge of wiki language, so I think he would make a great work on those pages that need formatting and can only be edited by Sysops. Jigo22 ^Talkie_SB 03:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
• Having more thoroughly read the first bit I'm changing my vote. I am now Pro-Ugo! --Fegaxeyl 20:29, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

• As I am becoming more and more Idle, I believe we need another admin to fill the gap I am leaving. That, and that fact that all round Ugozima has earned this position. Andrew 13:11, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
• I vote for Yes, but I have my doubts. Is Ugo really beyond the creativity, RP's, Dancus James Frumac, etc? Is he really worth the responsibility of a Sysop... 4ndrepd ^{Talk 2 me}_Contribs^{Streets of Varrock, the epic series!} 13:37, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Nay!

• Now, this was a tough decision, but I've thought it over. We have 4 active admins already, and we hardly ever get vandal attacks anymore, so I believe that having another admin would be pointless because of those two factors. Maybe if we get massive vandal/ hacker attacks every second, spamming every page and totally destroying the wiki, then I'd say yes. Talk, just keep it clean. 16:25, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Neutral!

• Ugo is definitely admin material, but as TED said, there are plenty of admins. As Ugo is such a strong contributor and extremely creative, he at least deserves rollback rights for now. Mr. Garrison 18:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
• I agree that Ugo is an excellent contributor and certainly deserves adminship, but, as usual, we have too many admins. I'm not saying I will, but I've found my admin capabilities less than what I was expecting them to be; although I'm not quite sure if I would I'd be happy to step down as an admin (if that's possible) and let Ugo take my place. --Fegaxeyl 20:20, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Comment - Adminship can be reversed by Wikia staff, but of course you need a very good reason (Like an Admin randomly blocking people). Jigo22 ^Talkie_SB 21:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC)